The Stag Hunt - University of California, Irvine.
We do so in the framework of Evolutionary Game Theory, employing the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Stag-Hunt metaphors to model the conflict between individual and collective interests regarding.
Prisoner’s dilemma, imaginary situation employed in game theory. One version is as follows. Two prisoners are accused of a crime. If one confesses and the other does not, the one who confesses will be released immediately and the other will spend 20 years in prison. If neither confesses, each will be held only a few months. If both confess, they will each be jailed 15 years. They cannot.
Stag Hunt is the security dilemma: many of the means by which a state tries to increase its security decrease the security of others. In domestic 2 Paul Schroeder, Metternich's Diplomacy at Its Zenith, i82o-i823 (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press I969), I26. 3 Quoted in Michael Howard, The Continental Commitment (Harmondsworth, Eng-.
The Prisoner's Dilemma isn’t merely an entertaining game, as those in the Rand corporation were fully aware. Many social interactions exhibit the structure of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Take a simple economic exchanges, for example. Since in many cases the payment and delivery of goods are not perfectly synchronised, the opportunity arises to.
Unlike the prisoner's dilemma though, it is better for them to both defect than to both cooperate. This is called deadlock because the two players will decide not to cooperate. This situation sometimes arises when two countries do not want to disarm so fail to reach arms control agreements. Stag Hunt The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau imagined a situation like this: In early societies.
Some of these games include the prisoner’s dilemma and analysts believe it better than stage hunt with regard to its explanation of Social Corporation. The primary difference between stag hunt game and the Prisoners dilemma is that the game usually involves two Nash equilibria in the event that both the two players cooperate or defect at the same time. Prisoners dilemma as a game generally.
Basically whilst it is an optimum strategy to be selfish in a single round of the prisoner’s dilemma, any iterated games (ie repeated a number of times) actually tend towards a co-operative strategy. If someone is nasty to you on round one (ie by testifying) then you can punish them the next time. So with the threat of punishment, a mutually co-operative strategy is superior.